Alside excaliber or Ply Gem 2000?

Ask replacement window questions & get answers!
Locked
Message
Author
bensaccount

Alside excaliber or Ply Gem 2000?

#1 Post by bensaccount »

Looking for some cheap replacements, which of these is a better product and why?

Any help would be greatly appreciated :D

User avatar
Windows on Washington
Posts: 5343
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 11:23 am
Location: DC Metropolitan Area-Maryland/Virginia/DC

Re: Alside excaliber or Ply Gem 2000?

#2 Post by Windows on Washington »

If those are my options, I go PlyGem.

Just my opinion but I have replaced a bunch of Alside sashes in my day.

Do you have other options?

bensaccount

Re: Alside excaliber or Ply Gem 2000?

#3 Post by bensaccount »

Windows on Washington wrote:If those are my options, I go PlyGem.

Just my opinion but I have replaced a bunch of Alside sashes in my day.

Do you have other options?
Those are the options that fit into the budget, thanks. Looking at the fram construction it looked like alside might be more sturdy, is there a reason you say ply gem? Thanks.

User avatar
HomeSealed
Posts: 3012
Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 3:46 pm
Location: Milwaukee, Madison, SE Wisconsin

Re: Alside excaliber or Ply Gem 2000?

#4 Post by HomeSealed »

I have used both at one point or another, and I'd choose the Plygem as well, based on the fact that I have experienced fewer issues. Keep in mind that both are widely considered to be "entry level" options, and neither performs particularly well in the area of thermal and structural performance ratings in comparison to some of the top choices like Okna/Himark or Softlite... Not trying to get "preachy", but I'd be a rich man if I had a nickel for every time that I heard someone say "anything will be an improvement over what I have", only to later regret spending thousands on a product fraught with service issues and sub par performance just to save those last few bucks.

masterext
Posts: 1406
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 11:14 am
Location: Window Pro-Serves All of Northern New Jersey. Bergen, Morris, Union, Essex, Passaic, Sussex Counties

Re: Alside excaliber or Ply Gem 2000?

#5 Post by masterext »

same response as the sister board. the Alside excalibur is a lower quality window and the plygem is entry level as well. you are basically throwing mooney away unless its a house flip or rental property. i would seriously consider increasing your budget or doing your projects in stages so you can get something that will provide you with the results you expect and you wont feel the need to do your project twice by replacing low end windows. its much less expensive to use a higher end brand than use a lower end brand. i see this all the time, its just not worth it and makes no sense; at least with windows and doors.

bensaccount

Re: Alside excaliber or Ply Gem 2000?

#6 Post by bensaccount »

Well even if you get your Ufactor to 0, then you also get no benefits from the sun naturally heating your home in the winter which is beneficial. None of you window salesman mention that part.

I want to know about a "lower end" window that has structural stability. The alside excaliber looks like the frame is more solid than most, is this the case?

What products to people recommend to someone looking for a lower budget solution to the window game?

To say someone would need to replace a properly installed average window in 2 years is just dishonest. If your current windows are leaking heavily the gain you would get from a new window that doesnt leak vs the double the cost fancier version is minimal when you talk about how long to recoup your investment etc.

User avatar
HomeSealed
Posts: 3012
Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 3:46 pm
Location: Milwaukee, Madison, SE Wisconsin

Re: Alside excaliber or Ply Gem 2000?

#7 Post by HomeSealed »

bensaccount wrote:Well even if you get your Ufactor to 0, then you also get no benefits from the sun naturally heating your home in the winter which is beneficial. None of you window salesman mention that part.
I'm afraid that is absolutely incorrect Ben (forgive me if that is not your name). If you spend some time searching through this site, you'll see that passive solar gain is mentioned with regularity. The balance that you are looking for between a low u-value and a good shgc depends entirely on your climate, and the design of your home (ie: side that the windows are located, landscaping, awnings, etc).
bensaccount wrote:I want to know about a "lower end" window that has structural stability. The alside excaliber looks like the frame is more solid than most, is this the case?
I'm afraid that for the most part, those two things are mutually exclusive. That's like saying I want a cheap car with 400 hp, good gas mileage, and great quality. There are trade-offs in any product that you purchase, and windows are no different. Unfortunately when comparing low vs mid vs high end windows, it is exactly the structural stability and "tightness" that will suffer. Most people think that its the glass, but that is not the case. Most manufacturers from low to high end all purchase their glass from the same handful of suppliers.
On the Excalibur in particular, my experience having sold and installed it is that it is one of the flimsier units that I've used. I've also seen a higher instance of service issues, primarily warped sashes, frowing sills, and air-leakage complaints. This is just my own personal experience, but from what I hear, it is a common complaint among pros.
My choices for entry level offerings would be the Okna 400, along with some of the lower lines from Polaris, Softlite, Homeguard, and Sunrise.
bensaccount wrote:What products to people recommend to someone looking for a lower budget solution to the window game?

See above. :D
bensaccount wrote:To say someone would need to replace a properly installed average window in 2 years is just dishonest. If your current windows are leaking heavily the gain you would get from a new window that doesnt leak vs the double the cost fancier version is minimal when you talk about how long to recoup your investment etc.
In terms of recouping your money in energy savings, that really depends on the differences in the u-vales, shgc, air infiltration, etc. In theory you are correct that small differences in these areas will take a long time to recoup. The problem is that the cheaper products are cheaper for a reason, whether it is the materials used, the manufacturing quality, etc. When corners are cut, the product will not maintain that performance over time, and lead to service issues/product failures, and/or overall dissatisfaction with performance.
Please don't take these recommendations as "salesguy bs" because its not. We are the good guys here, and we call them like we see them (some of us a little bit more gently than others ) :wink: The fact of the matter is, you don't need to pay that sleazeball sales guy $1000 per window, but the guys trying to make you think that you'll get quality for $200-$300 are just as dishonest. If you want a decent window that will last at a fair price (and installed properly by a competent company), you are going to be starting out in the $400-$500 per window range. There is just no way around that. It is no skin off our back if you want to go the cheap route, we are just speaking from experience and with the most sincere intentions. Please take that for whatever you feel it is worth. :)

Locked